Risk Factors for the Development of Early Recurrence in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Disease recurrence after retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery is common, and resection may offer no benefit for patients who experience recurrence early. This study examined the incidence of early recurrence (EREC) in RPS patients, and the association between EREC and prognosis, aiming to identify the factors associated with EREC. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at two tertiary RPS centers were analyzed. The study defined EREC as any evidence of local recurrence and/or distant metastases on the CT scan up to 6 months after surgery. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of EREC. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 657 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five of these patients (9.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-12.4%) developed EREC. Five-year OS was 3% for the patients with EREC versus 76% for those without EREC (p < 0.001). Patient characteristics were compared between the EREC and non-EREC patients, and EREC was found to be significantly associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p = 0.006), tumor histology (p = 0.002), tumor grading (p < 0.001), radiotherapy (p = 0.04), and postoperative complications measured as a comprehensive complications index value (p = 0.003). However, the only significant independent predictor of EREC in the multivariable analysis was grade 3 tumors, with an odds ratio of 14.8 (95% CI, 4.44-49.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early recurrence is associated with a poor prognosis, and a high tumor grade is an independent predictor for the development of EREC. Patients with EREC may benefit the most from new therapeutic options such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Experiences of patients and their relatives of postoperative radiological surveillance and surveillance intensity following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life: a systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative radiological surveillance following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma (sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, abdomen, pelvis, trunk or extremities) is standard of care in all international high-volume sarcoma centres in the world. The intensity of postoperative surveillance imaging is highly varied and knowledge of the impact of surveillance and surveillance intensity on patients' quality of life is limited. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the experiences of patients and their relatives/caregivers of postoperative radiological surveillance following resection of a primary soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus and Epistemonikos. Hand searching of reference lists of included studies will be conducted. Further searches will be performed via Google Scholar, to reveal further studies within unpublished 'grey' literature. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria. After retrieval of the full text of the selected studies, the methodological quality will be appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Center for Evidence-Based Management checklist for Critical Appraisal of a Cross-Sectional Study. Data on the study population, relevant themes and conclusions will be extracted from the selected papers, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review does not require ethics approval. The findings of the proposed work will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated widely to patients, clinicians and allied health professionals through the Sarcoma UK website, the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network and the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group. In addition, the outcomes of this research will be presented at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022375118.

Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.

Where Are We Now with Liver Transplantation in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? The Place of Liver Transplantation for Grades 1 and 2 Well-Differentiated Unresectable Liver Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review outlines the role of liver transplantation in selected patients with unresectable neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases. It discusses the international consensus on eligibility criteria and outlines the efforts taking place in the UK and Ireland to develop effective national liver transplant programmes for neuroendocrine tumour patients. RECENT FINDINGS: In the early history of liver transplantation, indications included cancer metastases to the liver as well as primaries of liver origin. Often, liver transplantation was a salvage procedure. The early results were disappointing, including in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. These data discouraged the widespread adoption of liver transplantation for neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (NET LM). A few centres persisted in performing liver transplantation for patients with NET LM and in determining parameters predictive of good outcomes. Their work has provided evidence for benefit of liver transplantation in a selected group of patients with NET LM. Liver transplantation for NET LM is now accepted as a valid indication by many professional bodies, including the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). It is nevertheless rarely utilised. The UK and the Republic of Ireland are commencing a pilot programme of liver transplantation in selected patients. This programme will help develop the expertise and infrastructure to make liver transplantation for NET LM a routine procedure.

Current management of benign retroperitoneal tumors.

Benign retroperitoneal tumors (BRT) represent a rare group of heterogeneous diseases. The literature lacks high-quality evidence about the optimal management of BRT, and most of the information available takes the form of case reports or case series. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current management strategies for adult patients with BRT. A literature search using PubMed indexed articles was conducted and BRT were classified into five different biological subgroups: 1) lipomatous tumors, 2) smooth muscle tumors, 3) peripheral nerve sheath tumors, 4) myofibroblastic tumors, and 5) others. Tumors that are primarily pelvic in origin were excluded. Despite the significant heterogeneity of the disease, several generic considerations have emerged and can be applied to the management of BRT. Specifically, the risk of misdiagnosing a BRT with another pathology such as retroperitoneal sarcoma is notable. When encountered, suspected BRT should therefore be referred to a specialized sarcoma center. Multidisciplinary tumor boards, present at these centers, have a pivotal role in managing BRT. The decision of whether to offer surgery, nonsurgical treatment or a "watch-and-wait" approach should be made after multidisciplinary discussion, depending on tumor histology. Moving forward, collaborative research efforts dedicated to BRT remain crucial in gathering evidence and knowledge to further optimize patient care.

Retrospective Analysis of Retroperitoneal-Abdominal-Pelvic Ganglioneuromas: An International Study by the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG).

OBJECTIVE: The Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group conducted a retrospective study on the disease course and clinical management of ganglioneuromas. BACKGROUND: Ganglioneuromas are rare tumors derived from neural crest cells. Data on these tumors remain limited to case reports and single-institution case series. METHODS: Patients of all ages with pathologically confirmed primary retroperitoneal, intra-abdominal, and pelvic ganglioneuromas between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2020, were included. We examined demographic, clinicopathologic, and radiologic characteristics, as well as clinical management. RESULTS: Overall, 328 patients from 29 institutions were included. The median age at diagnosis was 37 years with 59.1% of patients being female. Symptomatic presentation comprised 40.9% of cases, and tumors were often located in the extra-adrenal retroperitoneum (67.1%). At baseline, the median maximum tumor diameter was 7.2 cm. One hundred sixteen (35.4%) patients underwent active surveillance, whereas 212 (64.6%) patients underwent resection with 74.5% of operative cases achieving an R0/R1 resection. Serial tumor evaluations showed that malignant transformation to neuroblastoma was rare (0.9%, N=3). Tumors undergoing surveillance had a median follow-up of 1.9 years, with 92.2% of ganglioneuromas stable in size. With a median follow-up of 3.0 years for resected tumors, 84.4% of patients were disease free after resections, whereas recurrences were observed in 4 (1.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most ganglioneuromas have indolent disease courses and rarely transform to neuroblastoma. Thus, active surveillance may be appropriate for benign and asymptomatic tumors particularly when the risks of surgery outweigh the benefits. For symptomatic or growing tumors, resection may be curative.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Dealing with malignancy involving the inferior vena cava in the 21st century.

INTRODUCTION: Malignancies involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) have historically been considered not amendable to surgery. More recently, involvement of the IVC by neoplastic processes in the kidney, liver or in the retroperitoneum can be managed successfully. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In this systematic review we summarize the current evidence regarding the surgical management of the IVC in cases of involvement in neoplastic processes. Current literature was searched, and studies selected on the base of the PRISMA guidelines. Evidence was synthesized in narrative form due to heterogeneity of studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Renal cell carcinoma accounts for the greatest proportion of studied patients and can be managed with partial or complete vascular exclusion of the IVC, thrombectomy and direct closure or patch repair with good oncological prognosis. Hepatic malignancies or metastases may involve the IVC, and the joint expertise of hepatobiliary and vascular surgeons has developed various strategies, according to the location of tumor and the need to perform a complete vascular exclusion above the hepatic veins. In retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, the IVC can be excised en-block to guarantee better oncological margins. Also, in retroperitoneal sarcomas not arising from the IVC a vascular substitution may be required to improve the overall survival by clearing all the neoplastic cells in the retroperitoneum. Leiomyoma can have a challenging presentation with involvement of the IVC requiring either thrombectomy, partial or complete substitution, with good oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach with specialist expertise is required when dealing with IVC involvement in surgical oncology. Multiple techniques and strategies are required to deliver the most efficient care and achieve the best possible overall survival. The main aim of these procedures must be the complete clearance of all neoplastic cells and achievement of a safe margin according to the perioperative treatment strategy.

Association Between Ageing and Short-Term Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, more elderly patients are receiving surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). However, high-quality data investigating associations between ageing and prognosis are lacking. Our study aimed to investigate whether ageing is associated with inferior short-term survival outcomes after RPS surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS between 2008 and 2019 at two tertiary sarcoma centres were analysed. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality, and the primary explanatory variable was patient age, classified as: < 55, 55-64, 65-74 or 75+ years. RESULTS: The 692 patients undergoing surgery (mean age 60.8 ± 13.8 years) had a 1-year mortality rate of 9.4%, which differed significantly by age (p < 0.001), with rates of 7.2%, 6.9%, 8.7% and 22.8% for the < 55, 55-64, 65-74 and 75+ years groups, respectively. The distribution of causes of death also differed significantly by age (p = 0.023), with 22% and 28% of deaths in the 65-74 and 75+ years groups caused by post-operative complications, versus none in the < 55 and 55-64 years groups. On multivariable analysis, age of 75+ years (versus < 55 years) was a significant independent predictor of 1-year mortality [odds ratio (OR) 7.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.63-18.9, p < 0.001]; no significant increase in risk was observed in the 55-64 (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28-1.87) or 65-74 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.15) years groups. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative complications are an important cause of deaths in elderly patients. These findings are relevant to decision-making and counselling when surgery is considered for patients with RPS.

Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS. METHODS: An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. RESULTS: Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS. CONCLUSIONS: Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.

Overall survival in abdominal wall sarcoma treated with curative intent surgery: A retrospective study from two European referral centres.

INTRODUCTION: Primary abdominal wall sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous tumours. The mainstay of management is surgery, although local recurrences (LR) and distant metastases (DM) are common. OBJECTIVES: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary outcomes; factors associated with prognosis secondary outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery of primary abdominal wall sarcomas between April 2008 and May 2018 were identified at two referrals centres for sarcoma surgery. Patient demographics, tumour and treatment-related characteristics were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: A cohort of 65 patients underwent surgical resection with a median follow-up of 56 months, 5-year OS and DFS were 69% and 71%, respectively. Eleven patients (16.9%) experienced a recurrence event: 6 LR (9.2%), 10 DM (15.4%) and 5 both (7.7%). At univariate analysis, size (p = 0.03), grade (p = 0.001) and depth (p = 0.04) were associated with OS while size (p = 0.02) was associated with DFS. No significant relationship with tumour depth, type of surgery, surgical margin status or neo-/adjuvant treatment was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Recurrence events are less common following treatment of abdominal wall sarcomas if compared to extremities STSs, but size (≥5 cm), high malignancy grade (FNCLCC 3) and depth are associated with worse OS.

Comparison of comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to compare the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) in patients undergoing surgery for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: Data were collected for patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2019 at a tertiary institution. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was used as a surrogate marker for clinical outcomes, and associations with CDC and CCI were assessed. RESULTS: Data were available for 191 patients, with the highest CDC Grade of I, II, III, and IV in 18.3%, 41.9%, 17.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; the 30-day postoperative mortality (CDC Grade V) was 1.6% (N = 3). Whilst both classification systems were significantly correlated with LOS, this association was significantly stronger for CCI (Spearman's ρ: 0.768 vs. 0.648, p < 0.001). Increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor size, and organ weighted resection scores were independently associated with longer LOS. However, the association between LOS and both the CDC and CCI remained significant, even after adjusting for these factors (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CCI is more strongly associated with LOS than the CDC, and represents a useful tool to quantify the total burden of postoperative complications after surgery for RPS.

Cumulative Burden of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Correlations between postoperative complications and oncological outcomes have been reported in several malignancies, but their impact in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the association between postoperative complications and prognosis in patients with RPS. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at a sarcoma center were evaluated. The cumulative burden of postoperative complications was quantified using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), and associations with local recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: Data were available for 191 patients, of whom 160 (82.9%) developed at least one postoperative complication, with a median CCI of 20.9 (interquartile range 8.7-33.5). After postoperative deaths were excluded (n = 3, 1.6%), the remaining patients were divided into those with a CCI of 0-20.9 (n = 97) and > 20.9 (n = 91). Patients with a CCI >20.9 had significantly shorter OS than those with a CCI of 0-20.9 (43.3% vs. 69.5% at 5 years; p = 0.005), and this difference remained significant after multivariable adjustment for patient- and treatment-related factors [hazard ratio (HR) 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-4.09; p = 0.004]. However, CCI > 20.9 was not found to be a significant independent predictor of either LR (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.76-2.23; p = 0.333) or DM (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.61-1.93; p = 0.786). CONCLUSION: Increasing complication burden, as quantified by the CCI, is a significant independent predictor of OS; however, there is no evidence of a significant association with either LR or DM, which may be more related to tumor biological factors.

Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation. RESULTS: Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.